http://yield2me.com/-58733.htm
Saif Gaddafi after his capture
Benjamin Barber, author finds that the composition of the committee of "frankness and truth" in Libya, the best of the trial of Saif al-Islam Gaddafi.
He justified this view by an article in the Guardian newspaper, to see that fair trials are rarely finds its place among the smoke of the cannons, and the victor not only personal history but also the issue of its provisions, and emphasized his preference for the decision Lord Woolf's letter PhD Saif Gaddafi.
Also questioned by the ability of militias or Alzentan Libyan Transitional Council to organize a fair trial to the son of Gaddafi, the Criminal Court to stay the least likely places because of doubts within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
The author said that Libya should be tried by Saif Gaddafi to achieve the difficult transition from the case of revolution, ie the killing of tyrants to the state of democracy of any building free institutions and make the Libyan citizens are free. But a review of his work and his own role in the willingness to confront the demonstrators in addition to his studies at the London School of Economics and his charitable foundation and international leadership coalition of reformist included key members of the Transitional Council later like Mahmoud Jibril and Mustafa Abdul Jalil, all of these things must be taken into account, especially as transitional council does not wishan investigation into the role of Saif Gaddafi during the rebellion, but his role in the issues of corruption, torture and abuse of state funds and murder on behalf of the system, and this should welcome such a thorough investigation.
The author said that the ideal model for this investigation is the Wolf, which considered the question of a PhD Saif Gaddafi Fajlst that the ideas and liberal principles contained in them reflect his ideas, whether by himself or not is of the real foundations of the rule on the validity "of liberalism."
He started his belief that the report of the Committee, Wolf supports the view that Saif al-Gaddafi was a thinker and reformer, democratic and faced the threat of change and enter the likes of Abdul Jalil and Jibril to the government, in fact, faced danger in 2003 when he helped to negotiate Libya's renunciation of WMD program destruction and led Tripoli to openness to the West, and then helped in the release of five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor who were detained on charges of false which is inject 400 children with HIV, and played a role in the settlement of the Lockerbie matter, as was his effort essential in the release of Abdul Hakim Belhadj, who was jailed by Muammar Gaddafi at the request of U.S., and Belhadj is now the commander of the militia and al Qaeda in the past.
He added that by Saif Gaddafi rejected the name given by the media it is "the heir of Muammar Gaddafi," a favorite role is subject to the election.
The author said that the fault lies not in what he did sword before the protests, but when I gave up on the efforts of a decade and the abandonment of the reforms he initiated, but despite this he went to the Governments of Turkey and South Africa in search of a peaceful solution ensures abandonment of his father's power and his stay in Libya, but standing on the side of the family destroyed his efforts.
The fundamental question is why was Saif Gaddafi did during the clashes? Did the promotional role, or was it issued the command? Vojuah Mutassim and Khamis were driving Brigades bloody, but what for?
He concluded by Saif Gaddafi that deserves prison for what he did during the protests and confrontations, but it was to the side of reform and democracy for ten years. And there were not compelling evidence of direct orders him to kill the civilians or the leadership of the forces participating in the murder, he does not deserve the death penalty, today the Libyan people are screaming for justice, but if it was fair Vsadrick that the ruling will not be simple in this case.
Source: Guardian
Saif Gaddafi after his capture
Benjamin Barber, author finds that the composition of the committee of "frankness and truth" in Libya, the best of the trial of Saif al-Islam Gaddafi.
He justified this view by an article in the Guardian newspaper, to see that fair trials are rarely finds its place among the smoke of the cannons, and the victor not only personal history but also the issue of its provisions, and emphasized his preference for the decision Lord Woolf's letter PhD Saif Gaddafi.
Also questioned by the ability of militias or Alzentan Libyan Transitional Council to organize a fair trial to the son of Gaddafi, the Criminal Court to stay the least likely places because of doubts within the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
The author said that Libya should be tried by Saif Gaddafi to achieve the difficult transition from the case of revolution, ie the killing of tyrants to the state of democracy of any building free institutions and make the Libyan citizens are free. But a review of his work and his own role in the willingness to confront the demonstrators in addition to his studies at the London School of Economics and his charitable foundation and international leadership coalition of reformist included key members of the Transitional Council later like Mahmoud Jibril and Mustafa Abdul Jalil, all of these things must be taken into account, especially as transitional council does not wishan investigation into the role of Saif Gaddafi during the rebellion, but his role in the issues of corruption, torture and abuse of state funds and murder on behalf of the system, and this should welcome such a thorough investigation.
The author said that the ideal model for this investigation is the Wolf, which considered the question of a PhD Saif Gaddafi Fajlst that the ideas and liberal principles contained in them reflect his ideas, whether by himself or not is of the real foundations of the rule on the validity "of liberalism."
He started his belief that the report of the Committee, Wolf supports the view that Saif al-Gaddafi was a thinker and reformer, democratic and faced the threat of change and enter the likes of Abdul Jalil and Jibril to the government, in fact, faced danger in 2003 when he helped to negotiate Libya's renunciation of WMD program destruction and led Tripoli to openness to the West, and then helped in the release of five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor who were detained on charges of false which is inject 400 children with HIV, and played a role in the settlement of the Lockerbie matter, as was his effort essential in the release of Abdul Hakim Belhadj, who was jailed by Muammar Gaddafi at the request of U.S., and Belhadj is now the commander of the militia and al Qaeda in the past.
He added that by Saif Gaddafi rejected the name given by the media it is "the heir of Muammar Gaddafi," a favorite role is subject to the election.
The author said that the fault lies not in what he did sword before the protests, but when I gave up on the efforts of a decade and the abandonment of the reforms he initiated, but despite this he went to the Governments of Turkey and South Africa in search of a peaceful solution ensures abandonment of his father's power and his stay in Libya, but standing on the side of the family destroyed his efforts.
The fundamental question is why was Saif Gaddafi did during the clashes? Did the promotional role, or was it issued the command? Vojuah Mutassim and Khamis were driving Brigades bloody, but what for?
He concluded by Saif Gaddafi that deserves prison for what he did during the protests and confrontations, but it was to the side of reform and democracy for ten years. And there were not compelling evidence of direct orders him to kill the civilians or the leadership of the forces participating in the murder, he does not deserve the death penalty, today the Libyan people are screaming for justice, but if it was fair Vsadrick that the ruling will not be simple in this case.
Source: Guardian
No comments:
Post a Comment