According to German newspaper Berliner Tsaitong that the Administrative Court inMinden city of the state of North Rhine supported the army's decision to expel soldierwho converted to Islam from its ranks, because of the lengthening of the soldier of his beard and his preference publicly for the Islamic Sharia laws and the Constitution of the country.
The newspaper pointed out that the Court dismissed this ruling in the lawsuit brought by the recruiter before Sasha's 28 years, the armed forces against the decision oftermination 16 days before the scheduled date.
The newspaper quoted the judge Hartwig Weiss as saying "The army had no choice but to expel the soldier after he showed the last publicly and forms a clear rejection of therules of free and democratic force in the country, and the preference of Islamic law, regarding it as the best legal system and social on the planet."
The judge also said the soldier violating the orders of his superiors and not the performance of his duties, requires dismissal in accordance with the fourth paragraph of section 55 in the law of the German army.
The newspaper quoted a memorandum submitted by the Army to the court, referring tothe soldier's lawsuit converted to Islam six years ago, and drew attention to in the web sites.
Military Intelligence
He acknowledged during the investigation before the military intelligence preferenceprovisions of Islamic law on German law, and supported the use of violence when exposed to injustice and considered itself bound by the call to Islam.
The newspaper reported that the memorandum of the army said the soldier had violatedorders to Sasha and his superiors refused to cut his beard length of 14 cm to 2 cm, and the refusal to train recruits, citing an interview on the arms because of his fear of therecruiter went to Afghanistan and killing their Muslim brothers there.
She also said that the soldier who raised the case against the decision to terminate his military service based on the support of the constitutional principle of religious freedom,rejected the accusations against him.
It was not an extremist and has no relationship with Islamist militants, and approved in1800 by receiving the corresponding release of religious Salafi preacher Pierre Vogelobserver and his association (an invitation to the Committee).
The newspaper quoted the judges as saying in a verdict that a violation of the Army in dealing with the issue of a former soldier, nothing compared to what was expressed bythe last of the perceptions and by irregularities necessitated by the termination date by 16 days.
Source: German press
The newspaper pointed out that the Court dismissed this ruling in the lawsuit brought by the recruiter before Sasha's 28 years, the armed forces against the decision oftermination 16 days before the scheduled date.
The newspaper quoted the judge Hartwig Weiss as saying "The army had no choice but to expel the soldier after he showed the last publicly and forms a clear rejection of therules of free and democratic force in the country, and the preference of Islamic law, regarding it as the best legal system and social on the planet."
The judge also said the soldier violating the orders of his superiors and not the performance of his duties, requires dismissal in accordance with the fourth paragraph of section 55 in the law of the German army.
The newspaper quoted a memorandum submitted by the Army to the court, referring tothe soldier's lawsuit converted to Islam six years ago, and drew attention to in the web sites.
Military Intelligence
He acknowledged during the investigation before the military intelligence preferenceprovisions of Islamic law on German law, and supported the use of violence when exposed to injustice and considered itself bound by the call to Islam.
The newspaper reported that the memorandum of the army said the soldier had violatedorders to Sasha and his superiors refused to cut his beard length of 14 cm to 2 cm, and the refusal to train recruits, citing an interview on the arms because of his fear of therecruiter went to Afghanistan and killing their Muslim brothers there.
She also said that the soldier who raised the case against the decision to terminate his military service based on the support of the constitutional principle of religious freedom,rejected the accusations against him.
It was not an extremist and has no relationship with Islamist militants, and approved in1800 by receiving the corresponding release of religious Salafi preacher Pierre Vogelobserver and his association (an invitation to the Committee).
The newspaper quoted the judges as saying in a verdict that a violation of the Army in dealing with the issue of a former soldier, nothing compared to what was expressed bythe last of the perceptions and by irregularities necessitated by the termination date by 16 days.
Source: German press
No comments:
Post a Comment